426
Appendix F [referred to in Orrenfations on the Evide
Dupreme Court pp. 204] 267
9th October 1905
.
Si.
In reply to your queries I bez respectfully to state that when you have passed conditions of sale.
to
IKO,
it
LOOS
you had
after you
! yourselt personally.
leoked into thom, athing one to look into the,
"Japert
to-clock clates, names, and insonnets before returning- these to-Soliciters, you never asked me to settled them
nor have I ever done so
In
628
ofthe eviden
regard to questions 627, bes -takin Estore the Commission of euguing, I say that
You once sond
for
me
to ascertain the
of
copies of bilis allowed in Taxation because me Solicito had contoudect it was 2 another 3 while you also
Seich 3. and I confirmed what if
you
had stated. I
can the officer in charge of bills and there was
allowed I ann Dure of this.
nothing sail about a sum
of $6.2 or $3 bring
Fir that
nover at any
a quration of
I also boy to inform you
time have you
wer consuited me on a
practic or privedere - I am prepared to serve that
all Thave stated is the truth.
Norton Ky the Roy
Prages bar, upreme Court,
Your
Itan
or ocdient servant.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.